Evidence Hub

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Jordan, Middle East is it different? A quasi experimental study

Massad M, Odeh M, Bani-Hani A, Jebreen S, Alanasweh M, Dweik S, Shraim L, Saleh ZA et al.

Arab journal of gastroenterology : the official publication of the Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology, 2026

364 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Helicobacter pylori is a major cause of peptic ulcer disease and is strongly associated with gastric cancer. Rising resistance to Clarithromycin-based regimens has led to evaluation of alternative therapies, including Levofloxacin-based combinations. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Clarithromycin- versus Levofloxacin-containing triple therapy in a Jordanian population, and to assess the impact of diagnostic methods and metronidazole use on treatment outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized controlled trial, 364 adults with confirmed H. pylori infection were recruited from two governmental hospitals in Jordan. Patients received either Clarithromycin- or Levofloxacin-based triple therapy, with or without metronidazole. Diagnosis and treatment response were assessed using gastric biopsy, rapid urease test, or stool antigen test. Follow-up testing occurred four weeks post-treatment. Chi-square tests and Cramer's V were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The overall eradication rate was 65.1 %. Clarithromycin-based therapy showed a higher eradication rate (70.8 %) than Levofloxacin-based therapy (60.2 %), though the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.64). Among patients diagnosed via stool antigen testing, Clarithromycin therapy was significantly more effective (66.3 % vs. 40.4 %, P = 0.003). Neither metronidazole addition nor type of proton pump inhibitor influenced eradication outcomes.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 364 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free