Evidence Hub

Mitigated erysipelas after implantation of foreign material

Sauer J, Weyer T, Seifert A

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 2004

Abstract

When an infection occurs in the incisional area following surgery where foreign materials (i. e. endoprostheses, metal plates or plastic meshes) are implanted, a revision may become necessary because an infection in the area of the implant and involvement of the implant itself cannot be ruled out. In the case of a mitigated erysipelas, cultures taken during the revision seldom show bacterial growth. The disease progresses because surgery does not solve the problem of a weakened immune system and lymph stasis; on the contrary, it usually deteriorates the situation. A high dose antibiotic regimen is recommended as therapy for the mitigated erysipelas instead of an operative revision orally given. levofloxacin has proven to be successful reducing the recurrence rate. The course of two patients with mitigated erysipelas is represented for example in form of case studies. The patients were underwent several surgical revisions. But we had not to explant the endoprostheses at all. Finally both patients were treated with levofloxacin without further relapses.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free