Evidence Hub

Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1996-1997 respiratory season. The Laboratory Investigator Group

Thornsberry C, Ogilvie P, Kahn J, Mauriz Y

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 1997

Abstract

A U.S. surveillance study of antimicrobial resistance in respiratory tract pathogens in the respiratory season (1996-1997) is reported that included 11,368 isolates from 434 institutions in 45 states and the District of Columbia. beta-lactamase was produced by 33.4% of Haemophilus influenzae and 92.7% of Moraxella catarrhalis. Of the 9,190 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates tested, 33.5% were not susceptible to penicillin (MIC > or = 0.12 microgram/mL), with 13.6% having high-level resistance (MICs > 1 microgram/mL). For H. influenzae, the most active antimicrobials (based on percent of strains susceptible) were levofloxacin (100%) and ceftriaxone (99.9%); the least active were ampicillin (67.2%) and clarithromycin (58.1%). For M. catarrhalis, the most active drugs were amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin (100%); the least active was ampicillin. The order of the activity of the drugs against S. pneumoniae were levofloxacin (97.3%) > ceftriaxone (87.1%) > amoxicillin-clavulanate (81.7%) = clarithromycin (80.9%) > cefuroxime (74.5%) > penicillin (66.5%). The activity of the beta-lactams and clarithromycin against isolates of S. pneumoniae was closely associated with the resistance to penicillin. Levofloxacin was more active against S. pneumoniae overall, because it exhibited no cross-resistance. These data indicate that the incidence of beta-lactamase production in H. influenzae (33.4%) and M. catarrhalis (92.7%) is similar to other recent studies, and that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free