Evidence Hub

The clinical impact of antibacterial prophylaxis and cycling antibiotics for febrile neutropenia in a hematological malignancy and transplantation unit

Craig M, Cumpston AD, Hobbs GR, Devetten MP, Sarwari AR, Ericson SG

Bone marrow transplantation, 2007

Abstract

Febrile neutropenia is an expected complication during treatment of aggressive hematological malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplantation. We conducted a prospective cohort trial to determine the effects and safety of prophylactic fluoroquinolone administration, and rotation of empiric antibiotics for neutropenic fever in this patient population. From March 2002 through 2004, patients were treated with prophylactic levofloxacin during prolonged neutropenia, and a cycling schedule of empiric antibiotic therapy for neutropenic fever was initiated. The rates of bacteremia, resistance and complications were compared to a retrospective cohort of previously treated patients. The rate of gram-negative bacteremia decreased after the initiation of prophylactic levofloxacin (4.7 vs 1.8 episodes/1000 patient days, P<0.05). Gram-positive bacteremia rates remained unchanged, but more isolates of Enterococcus faecium were resistant to vancomycin after the intervention began. Resistance to the antibiotic agents used in the rotation did not emerge. There was no change in mortality during the intervention period. A prophylactic and cycling antibiotic schedule was successfully implemented on a hematological malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant unit. gram-negative bacteremia was significantly decreased, without emergence of resistance. Concerns with Gram-positive resistance will require further observation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free