Evidence Hub

Infectious keratitis caused by Klebsiella spp.: predisposing factors, presentation, and management

Masoumi A, Zeidabadinejad H, Jafari B, Esfandiari A, Soleimani M

International ophthalmology, 2023

37 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study predisposing factors, clinical presentation and management strategies for Klebsiella keratitis.

METHODS: A retrospective case review was performed on clinical records of culture-proven Klebsiella keratitis cases in a tertiary referral center over an 8-year period (from 2012 to 2020).

RESULTS: Thirty eight episodes of culture-proven Klebsiella keratitis were identified in 37 patients. The mean age of the patients was 62.9 years (range, 24-101). Multiple predisposing factors were identified in 33 eyes including history of previous keratoplasty (n = 11) history of ocular trauma (n = 7), preexisting ocular surface disease (n = 7) and diabetes (n = 6). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at presentation was light perception (LP) in 16 patients, hand motion (HM) in 12, counting fingers (CF) at 50 cm in 5, CF at 1 m in 1, CF at 2 m in 2. One patient had a CDVA of 3/10. On initial examination Hypopyon was detected in 21 eyes. Descemet's membrane folds were present in 1 eye. Corneal thinning was identified in 20 eyes and perforation occurred in 4 patients. Corneal ulcer progressed to endophthalmitis in one patient. Microbiologic sensitivity testing showed that 89.5% isolates were sensitive to amikacin (34/38),88.9%sensitive to ceftazidime (32/36),94.4% were sensitive to gentamicin (34/36),97.2% sensitive to ciprofloxacin (35/36), and 100% to levofloxacin (26/26).Ultimately, one or more surgical procedures was needed in 21 patients.

CONCLUSION: Previous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free