Evidence Hub

Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin: 1998-2002

De Vecchi E, Drago L, Nicola L, Colombo A, Guerra A, Tocalli L, Medaglia M, Gismondo MR

Le infezioni in medicina, 2003

1,917 participants

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate resistance rates to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1917 strains) isolated at Laboratory of Microbiology at L. Sacco Teaching Hospital in Milan, Italy in the period between January 1998 and October 2002. Twenty-five percent of tested strains were isolated from sputum, 18% from bronchial lavage, 10% from urine, 9% from ear, 4.5% from blood and 26% from other materials. Ciprofloxacin-resistant strains were 121/ 411 (29%) in 1998, 158/ 526 (30%) in 1999, 136/ 400 (34%) in 2000, 129/ 390 (33%) in 2001 and 53/ 190 (28%) in 2002. Resistance rates for levofloxacin were 132/472 (28%) in 1999, 104/ 400 (26%) in 2000, 101/ 390 (26 %) in 2001 and 47/ 190 (25%) in 2002. Our data highlight overall stability in resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin with minor variations for ciprofloxacin. Moreover, in contrast with international worldwide studies, resistance rates to ciprofloxacin remained higher than those related to levofloxacin throughout the period studied.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,917 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free