Evidence Hub

Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori in central Germany and its relationship with the number of eradication therapies

Selgrad M, Meissle J, Bornschein J, Kandulski A, Langner C, Varbanova M, Wex T, Tammer I et al.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2013

436 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates show a constant decline over the last few years. The main reason for H. pylori treatment failure is the increasing antibiotic resistance.We assessed antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori in a region of mid-Germany and analyzed the relationship of antibiotic resistance with the number of eradication therapies over a period of 7 years (2005-2012).

METHODS: H. pylori strains were isolated from 436 patients who underwent gastroscopy for different clinical indications. Susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin, and rifabutin was determined using the E-test.

RESULTS: Primary, secondary, and tertiary resistances against clarithromycin were 7.5, 63.2, and 75.4%, respectively. Primary, secondary, and tertiary resistances to levofloxacin were 11.7, 17.6, and 36.4% and to metronidazole were 32.7, 63.2, and 80.1%, respectively. The resistance rates against tetracycline and rifabutin were comparatively low (<5%), even in patients with previous exposure to these antibiotics. Resistance to rifabutin increased to 6.2% in patients who received more than two previous eradication therapies. Amoxicillin resistance was not detectable in all patients.

CONCLUSION: In our region, we observed a stable, but constantly increasing, resistance rate to antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Knowledge of the local antibiotic resistance rates is essential for developing successful…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 436 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free