Evidence Hub

Bacteriology of non-oncologic post-operative breast infections: A retrospective cross-sectional study to guide empiric antibiotic coverage

Abbott EN, James AJ, Kalmar CL, Reddy AP, Chaker SC, Torres-Guzman RA, Cornely RM, Gutama B et al.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis for non-oncologic breast surgeries is not well described by procedure type. This study identified the underlying microbiological etiologies and antibiotic sensitivities of culture-positive infections from non-oncologic breast surgeries that were performed at a major medical center to guide specific empiric antibiotic coverage.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from November 2018 to January 2024. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent non-oncologic breast surgery with culture-confirmed infections were included. Procedures analyzed included mastopexy, augmentation, reduction, gender-affirming surgery, and prophylactic mastectomies with and without reconstruction. Organism profiles from the procedures with >1 culture-positive infection were compared with their antibiogram to guide empiric treatment.

RESULTS: Among the 3457 non-oncologic breast procedures, 37 resulted in culture-positive infections (1.07%). Infected patients were older (mean age 44 vs 37 years, p<0.05), but no significant differences in sex, body mass index, tobacco use, or comorbidities were noted. Infection rates were similar between prosthetic (1.04%) and non-prosthetic (1.08%) procedures (p=0.94) but were significantly higher in the risk-reducing mastectomy cohort (3.65% vs 0.92%, p<0.01). Organism profiles varied with the procedure. Organisms isolated from all procedures were sensitive to vancomycin. Empiric treatment recommendations…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free