Evidence Hub

Simultaneous isolation of Chryseobacterium gleum from bloodstream and respiratory tract: first case report from India

Jain V, Hussain NAFA, Siddiqui T, Sahu C, Ghar M, Prasad KN

JMM case reports, 2017

Abstract

Introduction. Species of the genus Chryseobacterium are emerging healthcare-associated pathogens, often colonizing the hospital environment. There are no clear guidelines available for antimicrobial susceptibility of this organism. In this report we present the first case, to our knowledge, of simultaneous central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Chryseobacterium gleum from India. Case presentation. A 62 years old man with a history of a road traffic accident 1 month previously was referred to our center for further management. He developed features of sepsis and aspiration pneumonia on day 3 of admission. Four blood cultures (two each from central and peripheral lines) and two tracheal aspirate cultures grew pure yellow colonies of bacteria. Both matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry, (MALDI-TOF MS; bioMérieux, Marcy-L'Etoile, France,) and BD Phoenix (BD Biosciences, Maryland, USA) identified the organism as C. gleum. However, BD Phoenix failed to provide MIC breakpoints. The isolates of C. gleum both from blood and tracheal aspirate showed identical susceptibility patterns: resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems and susceptible to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, doxycycline, minocycline and vancomycin. Following levofloxacin therapy, the fever responded within 48 h and procalcitonin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free