Evidence Hub

Antibacterial prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia is not effective in the pre‐engraftment period in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Erica Ricci, A. Mesini, R. Bandettini, M. Faraci, E. Castagnola

Transplant Infectious Disease, 2020

3 citations

Abstract

the recently published guideline by Lehrnbecher et al [1] on antibacterial prophylaxis for prevention of febrile neutropenia in cancer children gives a weak recommendation with a moderate quality evidence not to administer systemic antibacterial prophylaxis for children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This recommendation was based mainly on a single randomized clinical trial [2], showing no effectiveness of levofloxacin compared to no prophylaxis (effectiveness 11.0% vs 17.3%; risk difference: 6.3%; p =0.06).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free