Evidence Hub

A randomised comparison of management strategies for drug-induced liver injury associated with tuberculous meningitis treatment

Donovan J, Hung TT, Hiep NTT, Nghia HDT, Ngoc LHB, Bang ND, Maharani K, Oanh PKN et al.

The Journal of infection, 2026

720 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) management during tuberculous meningitis treatment may result in premature rifampicin and isoniazid withdrawal and contribute to poor outcomes.

METHODS: Adults with tuberculous meningitis, enroled into the ACT HIV (N=520) and LAST ACT (N=720) corticosteroid trials (NCT03092817;NCT03100786), who developed DILI were randomised to strategy-1: continue all drugs, unless ALT ≥10x upper limit of normal [ULN], bilirubin ≥43µmol/L, or symptoms worsen; or strategy-2: stop pyrazinamide, unless ALT ≥5x ULN by day 6, bilirubin ≥43µmol/L, or symptoms worsen; or strategy-3: stop rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, continue ethambutol, add levofloxacin and aminoglycoside. The primary outcome was the proportion of time, 60-days following DILI randomisation, during which neither rifampicin nor isoniazid were given (or the participant died). Secondary outcomes included acute liver failure, and death/new neurological events.

RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants with DILI were randomised to strategy-1 (n=21), 2 (n=21), and 3 (n=25). Participants had fewer days without rifampicin and isoniazid in strategy-1 (median 7 days [1st-3rd quartile 0-31]) and 2 (9 days [0-21]) than strategy-3 (18 days [11-35]; p=0.022 and p=0.041). No participants developed liver failure. Strategy failure (requiring strategy-3 switch) occurred in 8/21 (38.1%) strategy-1 and 13/21 (61.9%) strategy-2. New neurological event or death after DILI randomisation, until 12 months from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 720 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free