Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance of nosocomial urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord injuries in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yan L, Ge H, Zhang Y, Li N

The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023

5 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite a high urinary tract infection (UTI) rate in spinal cord injured patents in China, there is limited evidence on the epidemiological character of that.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our article was to characterize the distribution of pathogens of UTI patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and the resistance profile of pathogens.

METHODS: A literature search of six electronic databases was carried out to identify the incidence, pathogen distribution, and drug resistance of UTI after SCI based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was carried out using R 4.0.2 software; a subgroup analysis was performed by the year 2012.

RESULTS: We screened 1110 eligible studies, 33 were included in our final review. A total of 7271 bacterial species were included in our studies; 6092 were gram-negative (81.13% [76.83-85.11]) and 1003 were gram-positive (14.89% [11.70-18.38]). Before 2012, E. coli (45.43%) was the predominant isolated pathogen, followed by Klebsiella (7.49%) and Enterococcus (6.01%). After 2012, E. coli (50.23%) was the main pathogen, followed by Klebsiella (12.47%) and Proteus (6.88%). E. coli was more likely to be resistant to Levofloxacin, Amikacin, sulfonamides, 4th-generation cephalosporins and Nitrofurantoin before 2012 (81.8% vs. 62.9%, 32.0% vs. 7.6%, 81.3% vs. 61.6%, 81.8% vs. 24.1%, 33.5% vs. 5.1%), whereas E. coli was more frequently resistant to Inhibitor-resistant β-lactamas after 2012 (56.3% vs. 34.0%). K. pneumoniae was more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free