A comparative study on the activities of six combination regimens against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in BALB/c mice
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to compare the activities of six combination regimens in a murine tuberculosis model infected with a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis isolate. After 1 month of treatment, all the combination regimens dramatically reduced CFU counts in the spleens and lungs, especially the regimens containing six drugs which had no visible counts in either organ. After 2 months of treatment, the spleens of mice treated with the six regimens all became culture negative, but for the lungs, only those treated with the regimens containing six drugs became culture negative. When levofloxacin was replaced by moxifloxacin, the regimen displayed a better activity. The activity of amikacin is closely related to the dosage. Despite in vitro resistance, isoniazid showed moderate activity. Clofazimine was able to improve the combination therapy results. Three months post-treatment, both the spleens and lungs of mice treated with the two regimens containing six drugs remained culture negative, while the spleens of mice treated with the other four regimens became culture positive. The activity of the regimens improved as more drugs were added.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Ferulic acid regulates the AKT/GSK-3β/CRMP-2 signaling pathway in a middle cerebral artery occlusion animal model
- Novel Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Parameters Quantify the Exposure–Effect Relationship of Levofloxacin against Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli
- Photochemical behavior of levofloxacin
- Correlation Between Dissolution Profiles of Salt-Form Drugs in Biorelevant Bicarbonate Buffer and Oral Drug Absorption: Importance of Dose/ Fluid Volume Ratio
- Evaluation of the synergistic potential and mechanisms of action for de novo designed cationic antimicrobial peptides
- Synthesis of [11C]levofloxacin
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.