Evidence Hub

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production and antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae causing clinical infections in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2012-2020)

Abay GK, Shfare MT, Teklu TG, Kidane KM, Gebremeskel TK, Kahsay AG, Gezae KE, Muthupandian S et al.

European journal of medical research, 2025

15 citations

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has grown to represent a serious threat to the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bacterial diseases. Due to their multidrug resistance attributes, the WHO has classified extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE)-associated infections as infections of critical significance, posing a serious risk to human health. Thus, the goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the pooled prevalence of ESBL-PE and AMR among strains causing clinical infections in Africa.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, two investigators independently made an electronic search in Google Scholar and PubMed databases using related keywords and corresponding "MeSH." terms for the PubMed. The accessed studies were screened, assessed for eligibility, and critically evaluated as per the PRISMA guidelines. The prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ESBL-PE in Africa were evaluated using a random-effects model of a meta-analysis. As a visual and statistical way assessment, the funnel plot and Egger's test were utilized to assess the risk of bias or publication bias, with a statistically significant level of bias being determined at p < 0.05.

Results: Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among the included studies done in Africa, the overall pooled proportion of ESBL-PE was reported to be 28% (95% CI 25-31%). ESBL-PE prevalence differed by region, the pooled…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free