Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of levofloxacin versus rifampicin in tuberculous meningitis: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Kalita J, Misra UK, Prasad S, Bhoi SK

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2014

33 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We report the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin versus rifampicin in tuberculous meningitis (TBM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial from India, patients with TBM diagnosed on the basis of clinical, MRI and CSF findings were included. Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction, organ transplantation, malignancy, pregnancy, lactation, allergy, seizure, age <15 years and antitubercular treatment ≥1 month were excluded. Sixty patients each were randomized to levofloxacin (10 mg/kg, maximum 500 mg) or rifampicin (10 mg/kg, maximum 450 mg). They also received isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, prednisolone and aspirin. The primary outcome was death and secondary outcome measures were 6 month disability, repeat MRI changes and serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 34.5 (16-75) years. The baseline clinical and MRI findings were similar between the two groups. At 6 months, 13 out of 60 (21.7%) patients in the levofloxacin arm and 23 out of 60 (38.3%) patients in the rifampicin arm had died (P = 0.07). On Cox regression analysis, survival in the levofloxacin group was significantly better than in the rifampicin group (hazard ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.04-4.34, P = 0.04). The functional outcome (P = 0.47) was, however, not significantly different between the two groups. On intention-to-treat analysis, 10 out of 47 (21.3%) in the levofloxacin arm and 5 out of 37 (13.5%) in the rifampicin arm had poor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free