Evidence Hub

Global challenges of bacterial infections in organ transplantation: assessment of risk factors and predominant bacterial pathogen profiles threatening liver, kidney, heart, and lung transplant recipients

Moradi F, Bahrami M, Nasrollahian S, Shirazi PS, Ghoreyshi NS, Ghobadi M

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Bacterial infections, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, remain a major threat to the survival of organ transplant recipients. This review aimed to systematically assess the most common bacterial pathogens, risk factors, and prevention strategies in solid organ transplantation (SOT), focusing on liver, kidney, heart, and lung transplants.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria targeting bacterial infections in human transplant recipients. Data were extracted on infection types, bacterial species, risk factors, immunosuppressive regimens, and antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Results: Among 75 eligible articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the predominant pathogens in most transplant types. Urinary tract infections were most frequent in kidney transplants, while lung, heart, and liver transplant recipients exhibited broader pathogen diversity, including MRSA, VRE, and Acinetobacter. Major risk factors included immunosuppressive therapy, pre-transplant colonization, prolonged ICU stay, and donor-derived MDR organisms. Antibiotic prophylaxis and immunosuppressive regimens varied across studies, with no universal consensus on optimal protocols.

Conclusions: Bacterial infections significantly impact graft survival and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free