Evidence Hub

Corticosteroids for adult patients hospitalised with non-viral community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

T. Pitre, Ellen Pauley, Dipayan Chaudhuri, R. Saha, K. Rudd, J. Villar, Lindsay R. Berry, E. Lorenzi et al.

Intensive Care Medicine, 2025

7,519 participants · 30 citations

Abstract

International clinical practice guidelines addressing corticosteroid treatment for patients hospitalised with non-viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of corticosteroids in hospitalised adult patients with suspected or probable CAP. We performed random effects pairwise, Bayesian, and dose–response meta-analyses using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) heterogeneity estimator. We assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE methodology. We identified 30 eligible RCTs, including a total of 7519 patients. The prednisone-equivalent doses ranged between 29 mg/day and 100 mg/day. Corticosteroids probably reduced short-term (28–30 days) mortality (RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.91]; moderate certainty) while the reduction in longer term (60–90 day) mortality is less certain (RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.76–1.03]; low certainty). Corticosteroids reduced the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.48–0.82]; high certainty) and may reduce duration of ICU stay (MD 1.53 days fewer [95% CI 0.31–2.75 days fewer]; low certainty), and hospital stay (MD 2.30 days fewer [95% CI 0.81–3.81 days fewer]; low certainty). Corticosteroids probably increased hyperglycaemia requiring intervention (RR 1.32 [95% CI 1.12–1.56]; moderate certainty) but probably have no effect on secondary infections (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.85–1.11]; moderate certainty). Corticosteroids probably reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,519 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free