Evidence Hub

Personalized Phage Therapy in an ICU Patient with Polymicrobial Pulmonary Infections: a case from a single-arm trial

Shi Y, Li J, Yang Q, Li J, Li L, Liu J, Dai J, Shang Y et al.

Nature communications, 2026

Abstract

Ventilator-associated infections (VAIs) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens poses a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Phage therapy has emerged as a promising alternative for VAIs, though its efficacy depends on multiple factors. We report a 40-year-old male ICU patient with sequential pulmonary infections of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Seven rounds of tailored phage therapy-targeting single or dual pathogens-were administered adjunctive to antibiotics. A. baumannii was complete eradication, but K. pneumoniae and S. maltophilia showed cyclical clearance and recurrence due to strain replacement and phage resistance. Phage therapy correlated with reduced bacterial load, fever, procalcitonin, and IL-6 levels, alongside improved pulmonary inflammation, while white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein showed limited response. No severe adverse events occurred. Dynamic shifts in dominant pathogens aligned with clinical progression, with phage therapy providing transient control, extending the window for intervention and reducing high-level antibiotic use. After six months, the patient was weaned from ventilation and discharged. This case underscores the complexity of VAI management and highlights the potential of personalized phage therapy to mitigate MDR infections and minimize antibiotic reliance. This case was enrolled in a single arm trial (ChiCTR2000036801).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free