Evidence Hub

The risk of stroke-related pneumonia: a systematic review of peripheral immunodepression markers

Maria Eduarda Ferro de Mello, Scarleth Andreghetto, Maiara de Aguiar da Costa, Victória Linden de Rezende, C. L. Gonçalves, Amanda Della Giustina, F. Petronilho

Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, 2025

12 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Ischemic stroke (IS)-associated pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality after stroke, driven by peripheral immune imbalance. This systematic review evaluates immunosuppression markers associated with pneumonia following IS in clinical studies. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases until March 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised clinical studies assessing IS-related immunosuppression and pneumonia, excluding in vitro and animal studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria, analyzing 1,833 post-stroke patients. Findings indicate that increased interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, alongside decreased repulsive guidance molecule A (RGM-A), are early indicators of post-stroke pneumonia. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in study methodologies and populations. Conclusions Elevated IL-6, IL-10, and CRP levels, along with reduced RGM-A, are associated with post-stroke pneumonia, emphasizing the role of immune dysregulation in its pathophysiology. Despite promising findings, further studies with standardized detection techniques are needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient prognosis. The variability in study methodologies presents a limitation to drawing definitive conclusions. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024543108.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free