Evidence Hub

Early Magnesium Sulfate Administration and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia: A Retrospective Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database

Thanh Luan Nguyen, Hoang Ngoc Thao Duong, Thi-Thi Nguyen, Quang-Dai Le, Phan Bao Ngoc Huynh, Van Hoang Nam Ho, Cong Dang Tran, Phuc Tuong Pham et al.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2026

9,203 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundDisturbances in magnesium homeostasis and magnesium supplementation are common in critical illness; however, the association between early intravenous magnesium sulfate administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia remains unclear.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (version 3.1) database and included critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with pneumonia. Patients were classified according to early exposure to intravenous magnesium sulfate, defined as administration from 6 h before to 24 h after ICU admission, or no exposure during this period. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes including 60-day and 90-day mortality. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with prespecified subgroup, interaction, and sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching.ResultsAmong 9203 eligible patients, 2975 (32.3%) received early intravenous magnesium sulfate. Magnesium sulfate administration was associated with lower 30-day mortality after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.94; p = .002). Similar associations were observed for 60-day mortality (aHR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95; p = .002) and 90-day mortality (aHR 0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.96; p = .004). Subgroup analysis identified a significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9,203 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free