Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance trends during COVID-19 in male patients: a descriptive analysis

Popescu RI, Petca RC, Mareș C, Petca A, Ahmed OS, Ostafi L, Jinga V

Journal of medicine and life, 2026

733 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in male patients represent a distinct and underexplored clinical entity. The COVID-19 pandemic has further influenced infection patterns and antimicrobial use, potentially accelerating resistance trends. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of uropathogens and their resistance patterns in a large cohort of Romanian men during the full pandemic. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary academic urology center in Bucharest, Romania, including male patients evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2021-February 2022). Male patients with positive urine cultures (≥105 CFU/mL) and a single identified pathogen were included, while duplicate and polymicrobial samples were excluded. 733 male patients were included, with Gram-negative predominating (78.99%) over Gram-positive (21.01%). E. coli (32,74%) and Klebsiella (27.15%) were the most frequent isolates. UTIs were markedly more prevalent in patients >55 years. Gram-negative uropathogens showed high resistance to commonly used antibiotics, particularly Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid (43.98%) and Levofloxacin (39.16%). E. coli demonstrated elevated resistance to Levofloxacin (36.52%) and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid (35.78%), while Klebsiella exhibited the most concerning profile, exceeding 50% resistance to Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid (57.29%) and Nitrofurantoin (56.96%), with additional carbapenem resistance (Imipenem 13.59%, Meropenem 12.9%). Gram-positive isolates…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 733 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free