Evidence Hub

Urinary bactericidal activity of Doripenem versus that of levofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infections or pyelonephritis

F. Wagenlehner, C. Wagenlehner, Rebecca Redman, W. Weidner, K. Naber

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2009

24 participants · 39 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the urinary bactericidal titers (UBTs) and 24-h area under the UBT-versus-time curve (AUBT) of intravenous doripenem (500 mg every 8 h [q8h]), a new carbapenem, versus those of intravenous levofloxacin (250 mg q24h) in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or pyelonephritis. UBTs and AUBTs are pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters able to reflect the activity of an antimicrobial substance in the urine. Doripenem and levofloxacin show comparable urinary excretion of approximately 80% and are therefore registered for the treatment of UTIs. In order to assess and compare the urinary antimicrobial activities of the two substances, UBTs were investigated for 24 patients (10 treated with doripenem and 14 with levofloxacin) for 31 uropathogens and one control strain. Eight strains were tested for all patients and 27 only in the urine of the corresponding patient. Median UBTs (AUBTs) of doripenem for the uropathogens tested ranged between 1.5 and 65,536 (224 and 909,312) and were significantly higher than median UBTs (AUBTs) of levofloxacin, ranging between 0 and 128 (0 and 2,208). Eight microbiological failures were observed, three after doripenem treatment and five after levofloxacin treatment. For levofloxacin, microbiological failures correlated well with low UBTs and AUBTs, whereas for doripenem there was no correlation. From this study, a calculated target attainment rate for levofloxacin predicting therapeutic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free