Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of Human Paenibacillus Infections and Comparison of Adult and Pediatric Cases

Danielle Smith, Kristen Bastug, Kathy Burgoine, James Riley Broach, Elizabeth Adrianne Hammershaimb, Christine Hehnly, Sarah U. Morton, Marwan Osman et al.

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2024

9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal infections due to Paenibacillus species have increasingly been reported over the last few years. METHODS: We performed a structured literature review of human Paenibacillus infections in pediatric and adult patients to compare the epidemiology of infections between these distinct patient populations. RESULTS: Forty reports describing 177 infections were included. Two additional cases were brought to our attention by colleagues. There were 38 Paenibacillus infections occurring in adults caused by 23 species. The clinical presentations of infections were quite variable. In contrast, infections in infants were caused primarily by Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus (112/141, 79%). All the infants with Paenibacillus infection presented with sepsis syndrome or meningitis, often complicated by extensive cerebral destruction and hydrocephalus. Outcomes were commonly poor with 17% (24/141) mortality. Cystic encephalomalacia due to brain destruction was common in both Ugandan and American infant cases and 92/141 (65%) required surgical management of hydrocephalus following their infection. CONCLUSIONS: Paenibacillus species seem to cause a clinical syndrome in infants characterized by brain abscesses, hydrocephalus and death. This contrasts with infection in adults, which is sporadic with only rare involvement of the central nervous system and very few deaths.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free