Evidence Hub

Antituberculosis effect of levofloxacin

Lu Y, Zhu L, Duan L

Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2000

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assess the activities of levofloxacin (LVLX) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis both in vitro and in vivo, the pharmacokinetics of LVLX and the effectiveness and safety of it in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis, with ofloxacin(OFLX) as control.

METHODS: The MIC and MBC of LVLX were determined by the tube doubling dilution method, and the effectiveness of the drugs were assessed by half survival time of the mice. The concentrations of LVLX and OFLX in serum were measured by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained were calculated. 138 newly diagnosed and retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients were randomly allocated to receive four chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS: The MIC and MBC of LVLX against Mycobacterium tuberculosis were 2 dilutions lower than that of OFLX, in a murine tuberculosis model, the antimycobacterial activity of LVLX was significant and superior to OFLX with the same dose. The concentration-time curves of LVLX and OFLX were conformed to an one-compartment model. There was no significant difference between the two formulations in the Tmax, T1/2 and 1/2 Cmax, 1/2 AUC of OFLX and LVLX. The sputum conversion rates at the end of treatments of groups I, II, III and IV were 97%, 97%, 82% and 84% respectively. X-ray resolution rates were 97%, 94%, 88% and 88% respectively. The side effects of four groups were rather low.

CONCLUSIONS: LVLX displays powerful activities against Mycobacterium tuberculosis both in vitro and in vivo, which is two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free