Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Cefuroxime-Tetracycline-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Penicillin-Allergic Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Wang H, Kong Q, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Li R, Zhang T, Guo L, Wang X et al.

Helicobacter, 2025

248 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergy significantly restricts therapeutic options for Helicobacter pylori eradication. This multicenter randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel cefuroxime-tetracycline-containing bismuth quadruple therapy (Cef-Tet BQT) as first-line treatment in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Penicillin-allergic treatment-naïve patients with confirmed H. pylori infection (N = 248) were randomized to two 14-day regimens: one received Cef-Tet BQT (Tegoprazan 50 mg twice a day, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily, cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg three times daily), and the other received cefuroxime-levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy (Cef-Lev BQT: cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily). The primary endpoint assessed noninferiority of eradication rates, with secondary endpoints including safety profiles and adherence.

RESULTS: In total, 248 patients underwent randomization. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 90.32% (112/124, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.12%-95.52%) and 81.45% (101/124, 95% CI: 74.61%-88.29%) (p = 0.045); the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) eradication rates were 91.80% (112/122, 95% CI: 86.93%-96.67%) and 83.47% (101/121, 95% CI: 76.85%-90.09%) (p = 0.048); and the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 92.37% (109/118, 95% CI: 87.58%-97.16%) and 85.34% (99/116, 95% CI: 78.90%-91.78%) (p = 0.087) in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 248 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free