Evidence Hub

Histopathological investigation of the effect of levofloxacin and cephalexin derivative antibiotics on bone healing in experimentally induced fractures in rat tibias

S. Demir, Delil Dogan, M. Tanrısever, E. Ozcan, O. Istek, Umit Koray Can, Turkkan Ozturk Kaygusuz, Burak Karabulut et al.

Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, 2026

7 participants

Abstract

This study compared the effects of systemic Levofloxacin and Cephalexin on bone healing in a rat tibial fracture model. The subjects were divided into six groups (n=7 each): healthy control, fracture control, healthy Levofloxacin, healthy Cephalexin, fractured Levofloxacin, and fractured Cephalexin. In total, 42 Sprague–Dawley rats were used. In the fractured groups, a transverse fracture was created in the right tibial diaphysis, and the bone fragments were stabilized with Kirschner wire. No surgical intervention was performed in the healthy control and healthy antibiotic groups. The antibiotic groups received systemic Levofloxacin (25 mg/kg) or Cephalexin (20 mg/kg) three times a week for 4 weeks, starting on the same day as the fractured subjects. At the end of the experimental process, all animals were euthanised. After the decalcification process, the obtained samples were evaluated histopathologically, and bone filling ratio percentages were analyzed using histomorphometric methods. In the statistical analysis, differences between groups were examined using one- way analysis of variance. In cases where the variances were not homogeneous, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Games–Howell post-hoc test. Bone formation ratios (%) showed significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). In this study, bone formation rates were found to be 90.71 in the healthy control group, 67.86 in the fracture control group, 61 in the fracture cefelaxin group, 51.14 in the…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free