Evidence Hub

A multi-center, randomized, controlled, double blind and double dummy clinical trial of antofloxacin hydrochloride tablet versus levofloxacin tablet for the treatment of acute bacterial infections

Xiao YH, Cui H, Xue F, Huang WX, Xiu QY, Li DT, Chen P, Jia ZP et al.

Zhonghua nei ke za zhi, 2011

719 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of antofloxacin hydrochloride tablet for the treatment of acute bacterial infections.

METHODS: A multi-center randomized control, double blind and double dummy clinical trial was conducted; levofloxacin tablet was closed as controlled drug. The duration of treatment was 7-14 days in both groups.

RESULTS: A total of 719 patients were enrolled in the study, in which 359 patients treated with antofloxacin and 360 patients treated with levofloxacin were included. Three hundred and thirty and 337 patients completed the study and met with all the criteria for per-protocol analysis, respectively. By the end of chemotherapy, the cured rates in per protocol set (PPS) population were 79.7% and 77.4%, the effective rates were 95.2% and 96.7%, and the bacterial clearance were 96.7% and 97.5% for the treating and control group, respectively. The clinical and bacterial efficacy of antofloxacin and levofloxacin was comparable by the analysis of infectious sites. Three hundred and fifty-seven and 356 patients in antofloxacin and levofloxacin groups were evaluated the safety. The drug adverse events occurred both in 10.1%, and drug adverse reactions occurred in 7.8% and 7.9% patients in the two groups. The most common drug adverse reactions were mild gastroenteric symptoms. No QTc prolongation was detected in all the patients. One patient in each group had mild blood glucose increase at the end of therapy, but the glucose returned to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 719 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free