Evidence Hub

In-vitro activity of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with various levels of penicillin resistance

Thomson KS, Chartrand SA, Sanders CC, Block SL

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1999

15 citations

Abstract

This in-vitro study was designed to compare the activity of levofloxacin with that of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, penicillin, amoxycillin, loracarbef, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, clindamycin and vancomycin against a collection of 202 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (56% susceptible to penicillin, 34% intermediate, 10% resistant). The isolates (60% nasopharyngeal, 40% middle ear) were obtained from otherwise healthy children at child care centres in urban and rural Nebraska, and at a paediatric clinic in rural Kentucky. MICs were determined by NCCLS agar dilution methodology using an inoculum of 10(4) cfu/spot. Using NCCLS breakpoints, the percentage of penicillin-intermediate and -resistant strains susceptible to the evaluable agents were, respectively, as follows: levofloxacin (99%, 100%), ofloxacin (87%, 100%), erythromycin (52%, 65%), ceftriaxone (93%, 25%), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (7%, 0%), clindamycin (93%, 100%) and vancomycin (100%, 100%). Without NCCLS interpretive criteria, no conclusions could be made concerning the susceptibility of penicillin-intermediate and -resistant strains to the other study drugs. All beta-lactam antibiotics, erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole were less active against penicillin-resistant strains, indicating that these may be suboptimal agents for empirical therapy for suspected S. pneumoniae infections in these patient populations. However, levofloxacin, ofloxacin,…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free