Evidence Hub

The Global Epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in Patients with type 2 diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Z. Younossi, P. Golabi, L. de Avila, James M. Paik, Manirath K. Srishord, N. Fukui, Ying Qiu, L. Burns et al.

Journal of Hepatology, 2019

49,419 participants · 1,967 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NASH with advanced fibrosis are closely associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), their global prevalence rates have not been not well described. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of NAFLD, NASH, and advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients by regions of the world.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid-Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from January 1989 to September 2018 for terms involving NAFLD, NASH, and T2DM. Strict exclusion criteria were applied. Regional and global mean prevalence weighted by population size in each country were estimated and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated using stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Among 80 studies from 20 countries that met our inclusion criteria, there were 49,419 subjects with T2DM (mean age 58.5 years, mean BMI 27.9 kg/m2, and males 52.9%). The global prevalence of NAFLD among T2DM patients was 55.5% (95% CI: 47.3-63.7). Studies from Europe reported the highest prevalence (68.0% [62.1-73.0]). Among 10 studies that estimated the prevalence of NASH, the global prevalence of NASH among subjects with T2DM was 37.3% (95% CI: 24.7-50.0). Seven studies estimated the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and T2DM to be 17.0% (95% CI: 7.2-34.8). Meta-regression models showed that geographic region and mean age (p<.05) were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 49,419 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free