Evidence Hub

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of BUB1B expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

Jie Chen, Yi Liao, Xian-Ming Fan

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2021

2,771 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Abnormal BUB1B expression has been proven to be related to the poor prognosis of various tumors. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the prognostic role of BUB1B in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Research design and methods Relevant studies from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases and two public databases that stored sequencing data were retrieved. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the BUB1B expression level and clinical characteristics were calculated. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the association between BUB1B expression and survival outcomes. Results A total of 16 studies involving 2771 LUAD patients with BUB1B expression were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with older age showed low BUB1B expression. High BUB1B expression was associated with male sex, a smoking history, and an advanced TNM stage. High BUB1B expression was predictive of poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, no publication bias was found. Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrates that BUB1B is a significant biomarker for a poor prognosis and poor clinicopathological outcomes in patients with LUAD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,771 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free