Evidence Hub

Cardiac troponin for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis

Yu Fan, Meng-Lin Jiang, Dan-Dan Gong, Chang-Feng Man, Yuehua Chen

Bioscience Reports, 2018

35 citations

Abstract

Cardiac troponins are specific biomarkers of cardiac injury. However, the prognostic usefulness of cardiac troponin in patients with acute ischemic stroke is still controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association of cardiac troponin elevation with all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies up to April 31, 2017. All observational studies reporting an association of baseline cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) or troponin-I (cTnI) elevation with all-cause mortality risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke were included. Pooled adjusted risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained using a random effect model. Twelve studies involving 7905 acute ischemic stroke patients met our inclusion criteria. From the overall pooled analysis, patients with elevated cardiac troponin were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.83–3.50). The prognostic value of cardiac troponin elevation on all-cause mortality risk was stronger (RR: 3.54; 95% CI: 2.09–5.98) during in-hospital stay. Further stratified analysis showed elevated cTnT (RR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.47–3.77) and cTnI (RR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.68–4.64) level conferred the similar prognostic value of all-cause mortality. Acute ischemic stroke patients with elevated cTnT or cTnI at baseline independently predicted an increased risk of all-cause mortality.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free