Evidence Hub

Orbital Cellulitis Associated with Scleral Buckle Infection Caused by Macrolide-Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus Complex: A Case Report and Literature Review

Rujkorakarn P, Patamatamkul S

Infection and drug resistance, 2025

Abstract

Ocular infections following scleral buckle placement for retinal detachment, though rare, can lead to significant complications such as orbital cellulitis and endophthalmitis. While Mycobacterium chelonae and M. fortuitum complexes were historically the most common nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) associated with these infections, cases caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) are rising, posing therapeutic challenges. We report a case of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (MAB) scleral buckle infection with orbital cellulitis in a 69-year-old male, successfully managed with buckle removal and prolonged systemic antimicrobial therapy. The isolate demonstrated multidrug resistance, including phenotypic macrolide resistance, despite no genotypic mutations detected in erm(41) or rrl. Treatment with imipenem, amikacin, tigecycline, clofazimine, and azithromycin resolved the infection. A review identified 12 cases of MABC scleral buckle infections, underscoring the need for comprehensive surgical and pharmacologic approaches. This case highlights the importance of molecular diagnostics, phenotypic testing, and species-level identification in managing these challenging infections.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free