Evidence Hub

Novel Management of Post-laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy-Associated Overactive Bladder: A Combined Approach of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Mesh Removal and Fotona Laser Therapy

Okui N, Okui M

Cureus, 2025

Abstract

This case report presents a novel approach for managing overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and Fotona laser therapy. A 73-year-old woman with severe OAB syndrome and pelvic pain after LSC underwent mesh removal via vNOTES. Despite the initial improvement in OAB symptoms, the patient continued to experience persistent urinary issues. Subsequent treatment with Fotona's non-ablative erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser therapy, including Vaginal Erbium Laser (VEL) and Urethral Erbium Laser (UEL), led to the complete resolution of OAB symptoms. The patient's Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) significantly improved following combined vNOTES and laser therapy. Follow-up assessments revealed sustained improvements in bladder function and quality of life. This case highlights the potential of combining vNOTES for mesh removal and Fotona laser therapy for managing post-LSC complications, particularly in cases in which mesh-related issues contribute to persistent OAB syndrome. The successful outcome, as evidenced by symptom resolution and improved OABSS, suggests that this approach may offer a viable solution for patients experiencing persistent OAB syndrome following LSC, especially when conventional treatment fails. This report contributes to the limited body of evidence on managing LSC-related OAB syndrome and introduces a promising treatment protocol…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free