Evidence Hub

Status of antimicrobial resistance in food animals in Pakistan (2016–2020): A systematic review and meta-analysis

M. J. Arshed, M. Umair, Usman Talib, M. Tahir, Muhammad Abubakar, Sami Ullah Khan Bahadur, Tahmeena Tahmeena, Riasat Wasee Ullah et al.

Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health issue, causing an estimated 1.27 million deaths in 2019. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the burden of AMR in food animals in Pakistan, identify resistant microbes, and highlight emerging trends in multidrug resistance (MDR). The major databases were searched for articles published between 2016 and 2020 on the prevalence of AMR in food animals in Pakistan. A random-effects model was employed to pool the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens. Among 1,145 studies, 35 met the inclusion criteria as evidence of AMR in food animals. Escherichia coli showed the highest resistance to ampicillin (59.5%), ciprofloxacin (49%), oxytetracycline (39%), and chloramphenicol (35%); Salmonella to ampicillin (78.4%), amoxicillin (53.9%), chloramphenicol (40%), tetracycline (39.3%), and ciprofloxacin (39%); Staphylococci to cefoxitin (53.8%) and penicillin (34.8%); and Campylobacter and Klebsiella to ciprofloxacin (50.4% and 83.3%, respectively). MDR was observed in E. coli (12/12 studies), Salmonella (7/10), Staphylococci (3/8), Campylobacter (3/3), and Klebsiella (1/3), with extensive drug resistance in E. coli (3/12), Salmonella (4/10), Campylobacter (1/3), and Klebsiella (2/2). Enterobacteriaceae showed significant resistance to tetracyclines (pooled prevalence/PPr = 0.75) and aminopenicillins (PPr = 0.74), whereas non-Enterobacteriaceae showed resistance to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free