Evidence Hub

The effect of fumaric acid on ruminant enteric methane emission and ruminal volatile fatty acids concentration: a meta-analysis

M. I. Malik, M. Capucchio, B. Tunkala, M. Muneeb, C. Ncho, Li-Zhuang Hao, Long Cheng

Journal of Animal Science, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Methane emitted by ruminants represents an energy loss from feed intake and contributes to global warming. Fumaric acid (FA), a key intermediate in rumen metabolism, acts as an alternative electron acceptor and offers a potential strategy to reduce methane production. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the effects of FA supplementation on enteric methane emissions and rumen fermentation in ruminants. Thirteen peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria, contributing 22 effect sizes from 13 studies: six on cattle (dairy and beef cattle), seven on small ruminants (sheep and goats). Effect sizes were calculated as mean difference (MD) for methane yield (g/kg dry matter intake [DMI]), relative mean difference (RMD) for methane production (g/day) and DMI (kg/day), and standardized mean difference (SMD) for volatile fatty acids. A multilevel meta-analysis model was used to account for study-level variation. FA supplementation had no effect on DMI (P = 0.25; RMD = –2.75) but significantly reduced methane production (P = 0.005; RMD = –19.21). Meta-regression showed that increase in FA (g/kg DMI) decreases in methane production by 0.272% (P = 0.02). Methane production was significant in small ruminants (P = 0.002; RMD = –24.67) but not in cattle (P = 0.52; RMD = –7.03). The effectiveness of FA in reducing methane production was not (P > 0.05) affected by variations in dietary forage, concentrate, or neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content in FA-supplemented…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free