Evidence Hub

Intra-articular injection of exosomes derived from different stem cells in animal models of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta- analysis

Yajie Kong, Yu-Zhong Wang, Yu-Jia Yang, Yu Hou, Jingjing Yu, Meiling Liu, Si-Yi Xie, Yongzhou Song

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2024

400 participants · 30 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the increasing incidence of osteoarthritis (OA) has attracted widespread public attention; however, the available effective treatments are limited. As a result, new therapeutic approaches, including stem cell and exosome therapies, have been proposed and are gradually gaining popularity. Because exosomes are immunocompatible, there is thought to be more potential for their use in clinical settings. This study summarizes the efficacy of exosomes in the treatment of OA. In total, we conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases using medical subject headings terms to identify studies published from their inception until November 2023 that investigated the use of stem cell-derived exosomes in treating OA. We focused on specific outcomes including osteophyte score, chondrocyte count, pain level, qPCR and histological assessments such as the OARSI (Osteoarthritis research society international) score to measure cartilage degeneration. For data extraction, we used GetData Graph Digitizer to retrieve values from graphs, and the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. We chose mean difference (MD) as the primary effect measure since all included studies reported the same outcomes. Ultimately, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. We evaluated 20 studies comprising a total of 400 subjects. Compared with control groups, the exosome-treated groups showed significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free