Evidence Hub

Improving large language model applications in biomedicine with retrieval-augmented generation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical development guidelines

Siru Liu, Allison B. McCoy, Adam T. Wright

J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., 2025

208 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective The objectives of this study are to synthesize findings from recent research of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and large language models (LLMs) in biomedicine and provide clinical development guidelines to improve effectiveness. Materials and Methods We conducted a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. The report was created in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 analysis. Searches were performed in 3 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO) using terms related to “retrieval augmented generation” and “large language model,” for articles published in 2023 and 2024. We selected studies that compared baseline LLM performance with RAG performance. We developed a random-effect meta-analysis model, using odds ratio as the effect size. Results Among 335 studies, 20 were included in this literature review. The pooled effect size was 1.35, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.19-1.53, indicating a statistically significant effect (P = .001). We reported clinical tasks, baseline LLMs, retrieval sources and strategies, as well as evaluation methods. Discussion Building on our literature review, we developed Guidelines for Unified Implementation and Development of Enhanced LLM Applications with RAG in Clinical Settings to inform clinical applications using RAG. Conclusion Overall, RAG implementation showed a 1.35 odds ratio increase in performance compared to baseline LLMs. Future research should focus…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free