Evidence Hub

Real-world effectiveness of nirsevimab against respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dewan Md. Sumsuzzman, Zhen Wang, Joanne M. Langley, S. Moghadas

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2025

103 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nirsevimab was approved in 2023, and implemented in all-infant immunisation programmes in several high-income countries to prevent lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Knowledge of real-world effectiveness of broad nirsevimab programmes is crucial to validate the benefits observed in clinical trials and guide immunisation policy. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of nirsevimab in populations where infant immunisation programmes were introduced.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health, and medRxiv from Jan 1, 2023, to Feb 25, 2025, to identify observational studies of immunisation programmes for infants aged 2 years or younger in routine clinical practice reporting original data for the real-world effectiveness of nirsevimab. The primary analysis focused on infants aged 12 months or younger. Pooled analyses were done with inverse-variance random-effects models for RSV-related hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and RSV-related LRTI incidence. For length of hospital stay, we used a restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) in days between the nirsevimab and control groups. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024628782).

FINDINGS

We identified and screened 1238 records, of which 32 cohort and case-control studies from five countries (France,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free