Evidence Hub

Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

K. Fountoulakis, Athanasios Saitis, A. Schatzberg

American Journal of Psychiatry, 2025

89 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intranasal esketamine has been approved as an adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation and behavior. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data on its efficacy against depression and suicidality as well as its side effects.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched with the keyword "esketamine" on March 24, 2024, using the PRISMA method. Data processing and statistical analysis were performed with R, version 4.3.3, and the meta-analysis was performed with the METAFOR package.

RESULTS

Of 1,115 articles initially identified, 87 were included for analysis and discussion. At weeks 2-4, randomized controlled trials were mostly negative or failed; however, the meta-analysis returned a weak but significant positive effect for depression (effect size range, 0.15-0.23 at weeks 2-4), similar to augmentation strategies with atypical antipsychotics for treatment-resistant depression. The effect size concerning suicidality was not significant at any time point. The sensitivity analysis produced the same results.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that esketamine's efficacy as an add-on to antidepressants is modest in treatment-resistant depression (similar to augmentation strategies with atypical antipsychotics) and is absent against suicidality itself. These findings need to be considered in light of esketamine's abuse potential and the fact that long-term effects are still not fully known.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free