Evidence Hub

Susceptibility-Guided Versus Empirical Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in a High Resistance Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Lu K, Zou X, Lang C, Zang L, Yang X, Sang W, Wang J, Feng Q et al.

MicrobiologyOpen, 2026

494 participants

Abstract

Clarithromycin resistance is a major determinant of treatment failure, and the benefits of susceptibility-guided therapy in high-resistance settings remains incompletely understood. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the susceptibility-guided compared with the empirical therapy in treatment-naïve H. pylori infection in a high resistance setting. In this single-centre, randomised, superiority trial, 500 treatment-naïve adults were allocated (1:1) to susceptibility-guided sequential therapy (SGT) or empirical clarithromycin -containing quadruple therapy (ET). Clarithromycin and levofloxacin antimicrobial resistance were determined using PCR. The primary endpoint was first-line eradication in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Sensitivity analyses were performed using complete-case and multiple imputation approaches. Among the 494 analysed participants (244 SGT, 250 ET), resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was 69.3% and 51.6%, respectively. In the ITT analysis, first-line eradication was achieved in 59.8% of participants in the SGT group and 62.8% in the ET group [absolute risk difference -3.0%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.882, 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.614-1.268), p = 0.499]. Per-protocol eradication rates were 84.4% and 89.7%, respectively [absolute risk difference -5.3%; OR = 0.620, 95% CI (0.328-1.173), p = 0.139]. Notably, despite a clarithromycin resistance rate approaching 70%, empirical clarithromycin-containing quadruple therapy achieved a high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 494 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free