Evidence Hub

Metabolic rebound after GLP-1 receptor agonist discontinuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chih-Chen Tzang, Pei-Hsun Wu, Chiao-An Luo, Zi-Ting Chen, Yi-Ting Lee, Ewen Shengyao Huang, Yuan-Fu Kang, Wei-Chen Lin et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2025

3,771 participants · 64 citations

Abstract

Summary Background To quantify the extent of metabolic and cardiovascular rebound following the discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy in adults with obesity, type 2 diabetes, or type 1 diabetes, and identify potential modifiers of these outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including adults and adolescents treated with GLP-1RAs, followed by a post-discontinuation follow-up of at least 12 weeks. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no language restrictions, and published up to October 17, 2025. We assessed changes in anthropometric, glycemic, cardiovascular, and lipid parameters between the end of treatment and the post-cessation period. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled mean differences. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 and GRADE frameworks. The study was registered with PROSPERO under CRD42025646185. Findings Eighteen RCTs (3771 participants) were included. Among individuals with obesity, discontinuation of GLP-1RA resulted in significant metabolic rebound, characterized by a body weight gain of 5.63 kg (95% CI: 3.52–7.73, I2 = 99.57%, moderate) and an increase in HbA1c of 0.25% (95% CI: 0.18–0.32, I2 = 98.45%, moderate). Waist circumference, BMI (Body Mass Index), SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure), and FPG (fasting plasma glucose) also showed significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,771 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free