Evidence Hub

Global Prevalence of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lin Zhang, Nian Cai, Li Mo, Xiaofang Tian, Hongcen Liu, Bohai Yu

International Urogynecology Journal, 2025

610,438 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

This study aims to systematically estimate the global prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB), identify demographic and regional factors contributing to prevalence variations, and assess trends in prevalence over the past two decades. This cross-sectional study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. From inception to April 2024, computerized searches for OAB prevalence-related literature were conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Studies of OAB prevalence in the general population were included. Two independent researchers conducted the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies. A total of 53 studies, encompassing 610,438 participants, were ultimately included in the analysis. The meta-analysis determined the global prevalence of OAB to be 20% (95% CI 0.18–0.21). Over the past 20 years, there has been an increase in OAB prevalence, rising from 18.1% (95% CI 0.13–0.23) to 23.9% (95% CI 0.19–0.29). Among women, the prevalence of OAB was 21.9% (95% CI 0.20–0.24), indicating higher rates compared to men (OR = 16.1, 95% CI 0.15–0.18). The study also found higher prevalence rates among overweight and obese individuals (OR = 18.6, 95% CI 0.13–0.24) and those aged 60 years and above (OR = 28.3, 95% CI 0.24–0.33). Middle-income countries exhibited higher prevalence rates compared to high-income countries. The study highlights higher risks of OAB among…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 610,438 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free