Evidence Hub

Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S. A. Waqas, M. U. Sohail, Muhammad Saad, A. M. Minhas, Stephen J. Greene, M. Fudim, Gregg C. Fonarow, D. Abramov et al.

Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2025

8,788 participants · 54 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of heart failure cases, with obesity playing a key role. Residual risk remains high despite available therapies. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown potential cardiometabolic benefits, but their role in HFpEF remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating GLP-1RAs in HFpEF was conducted. Studies evaluating GLP-1RA in combination with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were also included. The analyzed outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) death, worsening heart failure (HF) events, and their composite. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six RCTs with 8,788 patients were included. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced the composite outcome of CV death or worsening HF events (HR: 0.68 [0.51-0.89], p = 0.006, I² = 47%) as well as worsening HF events alone (HR: 0.56 [0.38-0.82], p = 0.003, I² = 51%). No significant reduction was observed for CV death alone (HR: 0.86 [0.67-1.12], p = 0.27, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

GLP-1RAs reduce worsening HF events and the composite of CV death or worsening HF in HFpEF, particularly in patients with obesity or diabetes. These findings support their role as a promising therapy requiring further HFpEF-focused trials.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,788 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free