Evidence Hub

Association between maternal diabetes and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 202 observational studies comprising 56·1 million pregnancies

Wenrui Ye, Cong Luo, Jun Zhou, Xisong Liang, Jie Wen, Jing Huang, Yu Zeng, Yinghua Wu et al.

The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2025

98 participants · 55 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal diabetes might alter fetal brain development. However, well-designed systematic analyses are needed to comprehensively assess and quantify the association between maternal diabetes and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. We aimed to synthesise and evaluate the available evidence on the effects of maternal diabetes on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and EBSCO databases from inception to Dec 1, 2024, for studies exploring neurodevelopmental outcomes of children born to mothers with diabetes. The primary outcome was neurodevelopmental disorders, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. Data were extracted from published reports. Data were pooled with random-effects models and presented as risk ratios or standard mean differences with 95% CIs. This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023395464).

FINDINGS

202 studies, involving 56 082 462 mother-child pairs, were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 110 (54%) examined gestational diabetes, while 80 (40%) investigated pre-gestational diabetes. Among the total studies reviewed, 169 (84%) exclusively focused on children and adolescents aged up to 18 years. In studies adjusting for at least one key confounder, maternal diabetes was associated with increased risks of all types of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free