Evidence Hub

Global prevalence and psychological impact of bullying among children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

T. A. Ariani, Alfiani Rahmi Putri, Figa Altuno Firdausi, Nur Aini

Journal of Affective Disorders, 2025

603,231 participants · 68 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bullying is a significant public health concern with negative consequences. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and psychological impact of bullying among children and adolescents.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of CINAHL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until April 2024. Data were analyzed using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model adopted random-effect model in R software. We assessed heterogeneity using I2 test and Cochran's Q-statistic and study quality using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Moreover, meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified factors contributing to prevalence of bullying.

RESULTS

A total of 116 studies involving 603,231 participants were identified. The pooled prevalence of bullying victims was 25 % (95%CI: 22 %-28 %), followed by 16 % (13 %-20 %) for bullying perpetrators, and 16 % (11 %-21 %) for bully-victims (individuals who experience both roles). We found that bullying has psychological impacts for all groups, including emotional distress, loneliness, anxiety, depression, self-harming behavior, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempts.

LIMITATIONS

The results showed high heterogeneity; however, meta-regression and sub-group analyses were performed to identify potential moderating factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that one-quarter of children and adolescents are bullying victims, while perpetrators and bully-victims share a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 603,231 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free