Evidence Hub

The effectiveness and safety of therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the hepatic vein, inferior vena cave and/or right atrium: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Qing-Bo Wang, Jin Li, Zi-Jun Zhang, Yu-Kai Li, Yu-Bo Liang, Xing-Ming Chen, Wan-Ling Luo, Yawhan Lakang et al.

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2025

453 participants · 69 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT), inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT), and/or right atrium tumor thrombus (RATT). Research design and methods A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases up to 22 August 2024, was conducted, focusing on overall survival (OS), progression -free survival (PFS), and adverse reactions. Results Seven studies involving 453 patients were analyzed. Treatment strategies included surgery alone, local ± systemic therapy, and surgery with adjuvant therapy. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates for all patients were 63.3%, 21.6% , and 8.3%, respectively. Surgery with adjuvant therapy achieved the highest 1-year OS, while local ± systemic therapy led to the best 5-year OS. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates for all patients were 56.8%, 9.4%, and 1.6%, respectively. Surgery alone commonly caused ascites and pleural effusion; the local ± systemic therapy commonly caused hepatic dysfunction and platelet abnormalities; and surgery with adjuvant therapy commonly caused peritoneal abscess. Conclusion Local ± systemic therapy provided the best long-term OS and manageable complications among the therapeutic strategies for HCC with HVTT, IVCTT, and/or RATT. Registration PROSPERO, (CRD42024573152)

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 453 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free