Evidence Hub

Global update on the in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and rates of resistant phenotypes (2016-2018)

H. Seifert, J. Blondeau, K. Lucassen, Eric Utt

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2022

40 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study presents 2016-2018 in vitro antimicrobial activity data and rates of resistant phenotypes for clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from Africa/Middle East, Asia/South Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America.

METHODS

A total of 4,320 A. baumannii isolates were collected from all regions between 2016 and 2018. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin, meropenem and tigecycline were determined using the broth microdilution methodology of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints (version 11.0). Rates of subsets that were resistant to amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin and meropenem, according to EUCAST breakpoints, are also presented.

RESULTS

In each region, tigecycline and colistin were active against isolates of A. baumannii (MIC90 values, 1 or 2 mg/L) and the lowest rate of resistance was to colistin (1.2%-7.3%). The rates of resistance to the panel of agents were generally lower among A. baumannii from North America (1.3%-42.7%), compared with the other regions. Fewer than 11% of meropenem-resistant A. baumannii were also resistant to colistin. The rates of amikacin-, levofloxacin- and meropenem-resistant A. baumannii were lowest in North America and mostly higher in Africa/Middle East and Latin America.

CONCLUSIONS

In each geographical region, tigecycline and…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free