Evidence Hub

Global reasons for missed nursing care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Feng-Xiang Gong, Yuchen Mei, Mengying Wu, Chao Tang

International Nursing Review, 2025

49 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While numerous studies have quantified the prevalence of reasons for missed care, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence across various health systems remains lacking.

AIM

To estimate the pooled prevalence of the reasons reported by nurses for missed care, using data from the MISSCARE surveys.

INTRODUCTION

Missed nursing care, which refers to any aspect of essential patient care that is omitted or delayed, presents substantial risks to patient safety and the quality of care.

METHODOLOGY

Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus) were searched, without language restrictions. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate prevalence estimates and evaluate heterogeneity via prediction intervals. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess potential sources of heterogeneities. Time trends were estimated using linear regression modeling.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies (2011-2024) totaling 20768 nurses from 121 hospitals from 14 countries were included. The raw prevalence of missed care ranged from 6.8% to 98.1%, with a median of 56.4% (IQR: 41.0-75.4). The most frequently reported reasons were "unexpected rise in patient volume and/or acuity on the unit" (78.1%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 71.5-54.1), "inadequate number of staff" (76.5%; 95% CI, 68.7-83.5), and "urgent patient situation" (73.5%; 95% CI, 66.6-79.9). Most of the investigated reasons for missed nursing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free