Evidence Hub

Barriers and Enablers to Leadership in Advanced Practice Nursing: A Systematic Review

Rosemary Fosah, Sofia Llahana

International Nursing Review, 2025

5,243 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To explore the barriers and enablers influencing leadership enactment by advanced practice nurses and assess how these have evolved over the past decade. Introduction Nurses in advanced practice roles are well‐positioned to drive healthcare change, addressing patient needs and service demands. However, their leadership contributions are often underestimated, with greater emphasis placed on clinical practice and education rather than leadership and research. Methods A systematic review of cross‐sectional studies was conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2015 and March 2024. Fourteen studies involving 5243 participants were narratively synthesised. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool, and findings are reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Findings The review identified 24 barriers and 18 enablers to enacting leadership in advanced practice nursing roles, grouped into eight themes across four structural levels: healthcare system, organisational, team, and individual. Key themes included leadership capacity building, role clarity, development opportunities, resource allocation, and mentorship. Major barriers were unclear roles, limited leadership training, and resource constraints, while enablers included mentorship, leadership programmes, and organisational support.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,243 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free