Evidence Hub

Impact of active vs. passive application of dental adhesives on bond strength to dentin and enamel: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies

Gabriela Luiza Moreira Carvalho, Paulo Matias Moreira, B. Carneiro, T. Y. Suzuki, M. Lanza, H. H. Alvim, Marcelo Giannini, Carolina Bosso André

Japanese Dental Science Review, 2025

13 citations

Abstract

The application method of adhesive systems affects both immediate and long-term bond strength. This systematic review analyzed in vitro studies comparing active versus passive application of adhesives on enamel and dentin, regardless of classification. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, and Grey Literature. Included studies assessed bond strength with active or passive application. Meta-analyses were stratified by substrate (enamel and dentin) and application mode (etch-and-rinse or self-etching), using a random-effects model and I² index for heterogeneity. The RobDEMAT tool assessed the risk of bias. Out of 3022 articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that passive application of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode resulted in higher bond strength to enamel. However, active application of etch-and-rinse or universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode improved bond strength on dentin. For self-etching or universal adhesives in self-etching mode, active application enhanced bond strength on both enamel and dentin. Few studies assessed longevity, but those that did reported positive outcomes for active application. One self-curing universal adhesive showed significantly different results. In conclusion, active application improves bond strength to dentin in two-step etch-and-rinse mode and to unconditioned enamel and dentin in self-etching mode.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free